Paolini's Writing gets Worse with Practice

[edward9]

I read the first three chapters of To Sleep in a Sea of Stars for sporking purposes. I was struck by how much worse the writing was. In terms of objective measurements like grammar and sentence structure it is worse than the Inheritance Cycle. The Inheritance Cycle seems to have had a copy editor and I cannot imagine To Sleep in a sea of Stars was copy edited. A copy editor edits into a certain style and just the use of punctuation defies any system I am familiar with. I am no expert but I have never seen punctuation patterns like that. For semi objective things like writing style and structure I think most editors and writers would find it worse than the Inheritance Cycle. As has been pointed out by others nothing of significance happens in the first three chapters other than introducing the main character.

What struck me the most is the degradation in an admittedly more subjective area. The story was really boring. I found it difficult and unpleasant to read too but it was really really boring. It was so boring I could not find much to spork. Everything is just too blah, empty, with nothing to it. It is hard to imagine so many words could say so very little. How do others find To Sleep in a Sea of Stars compares to the Inheritance Cycle? Am I the only one who thinks Paolini's technical writing skills have gotten noticeably to massively worse?

Comments

[edward9]

I think he just has gotten more and more bored with this book, and has gotten more and more lazy.

I do not necessarily disagree with this. What I do not fathom, if this is the case, is why he would write To Sleep in a Sea of Stars at all. Writing is unpleasant enough when you are passionate about the story (at least if you are attempting good writing). Why write it all if he has so little interest? Need of money? Why make it so long? His last book shows he has no problem writing so little it can be construed as an insult to his fans. Why not churn out something half the size and just stop writing once it is boring? Why not break it into part one and two and try for more money that way? Either approach has the potential for more profit for less work and keeps him relevant (or whatever it should be called as an author). He can still go on interviews and brag about how great he is. In fact, the same work would result in twice as many interviews if it were broken up a sequel.

[epistler]

Writing is unpleasant enough when you are passionate about the story (at least if you are attempting good writing). Why write it all if he has so little interest?

The more cynical explanation I can come up with is that he just likes the fame and the money, and that's the only reason why he's still writing. The other, less cynical theory I have is that he actually does care, but doesn't have the talent to get it to show on the page.

Mind you, when I was depressed and no longer able to enjoy writing, the fact that my heart really wasn't in it absolutely showed. It resulted in lifeless prose, the rushed pacing you get when the author just wants to get it over with, careless mistakes and a general lack of effort across the board. I just didn't care enough to try harder. Of course, the important difference here is that nobody wanted to publish the results. Because I actually have to produce quality to get anywhere, unlike some people I could mention.

[anontu]

His social media highly suggests it's the latter. He talks about the books he wrote in his head rather than what's on the page.

Wow Epistler, I can relate to you about struggling with writing so much now. I like my stories. However I'm really having trouble with them.

[epistler]

His social media highly suggests it's the latter. He talks about the books he wrote in his head rather than what's on the page.

I had a feeling. It's a lot easier to write someone off as just cynical and greedy when they're rich and also mediocre, but my philosophy is never to put down to malice what you can put down to incompetence, because the latter is way, way more common, most likely because of the simple fact that it takes less effort.

Wow Epistler, I can relate to you about struggling with writing so much now. I like my stories. However I'm really having trouble with them.

I know what you mean, groan. People talk about how you should treat writing like a job and all that, but the fact remains that if you're not in the right headspace it becomes that much harder, or even downright impossible. You either don't have the mental energy to produce, or just plain don't care enough to even try any more.

[epistler]

I don't think we're really in any position to make judgements about his mental state. I think it's pretty clear though that he actually does believe he'd gotten better - that this is his big fanfare release, showing off how far he's come, how he's finally matured since his "practise novel", Eragon.
He just happens to be completely and embarrassingly wrong.

[epistler]

And you're completely right that material success doesn't necessarily make people happy. Generally it just seems to make them hungry for more and more of it, which is not good because with hollow prizes of that sort enough is never enough, and being deprived of it makes you miserable. It's probably a large reason why so may celebrities end up drinking or drugging themselves to death even when they seem to have everything.